意识可以由数学模型表示,其本质是同构。
an image. They concluded that perceptual decisions are made by integrating evidence from sensory processing area, i.e., decision-making areas use the output from the lower level sensory regions. This use just indicates that combination of information mapping the entities correspond combination of neuron units, i.e., the pattern or process of the neural correlate of consciousness of human is just the information meeting equation (2) .The consciousness can be analyzed as following.
Let n1 n 2……n n denote neurons or less units of neurons
: combination of neurons or the units less neurons in time serial
* refers to a simple relation of standing side by side. f0 (n1 n 2……n n) represent corresponsive information by n1 n 2……n n , i.e., f0 (n1 n 2……n n)= x1gx2……x n
In the experiment of Heekeren, f1 (face-responsive region) = face
Therefore, we have f1 (f0 (n1 n 2……n n) g) = f1 (x1) * f1 (x2)……f1 (x n)
(6)
f1(f0 (face-responsive region face-responsive
(7)
region āitā- responsive region ābeā-responsive region ) )
= f1(face ghouse gitgbe) = f1(it is the face, it is the house) = f1(face) * f1(house)
= the image of the face for test * the image of the house for test
Equation (6), (7) are the bridge linking the objectivity, consciousness and neurons and joining physics and metaphysics. It interprets the model in the physical sense.
the inner parts of the system. Consciousness exists when : (1) the units of system certainly map the entities outside the system; (2) the system operate by some rules; and (3) the rules certainly map some laws or relations in the entities. In one word, the essence of consciousness is certain correspondence between substance with some rules or laws. The homomorphic model is the definition widely accepted by the multi -fields and can be as a standard to the various systems to define whether it owns consciousness or not, and be a common ruler to value whether a life or machine possesses consciousness.
These conclusions showed further more that there is not any thing but empirical and computable substance in (for) the matter named as “consciousness” for all the essence and phenomena of consciousness can be interpreted by the substance in the two end of the homomorphic equation. Therefore, we further conclude that:
(1) There is not the limitations between human, machines and animals if we acknowledge that they all made of substance.
(2) Both materialism and idealism are wrong for they maintain that consciousness is independent with substance in which consciousness lies.
(3) Some scientists holding that the neutrons are only relatives to consciousness but consciousness itself might also be wrong for they can not set up the model of consciousness free to the homomorphic model.
References
1. D. M. Armstrong, Norman Malcolm. Consciousness and Causality: A Debate on the Nature of Mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984 2. H.R. Heekeren et al, A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain, Nature, Vol.431 14 October 2004 , 859-862 3.Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, vol 23 (202) , Beijing, People Press, 1972 4. Marian Stamp Dawkins, The search for animal consciousness, Chapter 3, Oxford University Press, 1998 consciousness, Chapter 3, Oxford University Press, 1998
5. Conclusion
Although consciousness is not empirical, it can be expressed by homomorphic model as the
5. Marian Stamp Dawkins, The search for animal correspondence between entities outside the system and