读了很多遍，仍然不会做这个题
Bungling 拙劣的，笨拙的，粗劣的 Hindrance 障碍，妨碍，阻碍 没看懂
Beholden 负有义务的，蒙恩的，对。。。表示感激的 做错原因是不认识单词
逻辑是在建房子和路，鹿会被路吸引过来。假设是建房子会留下足够的森林保持很大数量的鹿。
文章大意是FW认为legal documents are the best available evidence about the economic and social history of a given period. 但历史学家花了很长时间才开始系统的注意这方面的研究。原因1是the subject requires researchers to “master an extremely formal system of pleading and
procedure.” 但是其复杂性和现在一些研究criminal law in England during the same period的并不完全不同。 另一个解释是most people in modern England had little contact with civil law. 如果是这样的话，学者就不必研究the history of lega matters了。但最近的研究表明civil litigation during the period involved artisans, merchants, professionals, shopkeepers, and farmers, and not merely a narrow propertied elite. 正好和选项中的illustrate the wide range of people who used the civil legal system in that period.
The wide spread assumption is inaccurate. It says that most people in modern England had little to do with civil laws. So the history of civil law in early modern England should enrich the general historical scholarship of that period.
文章中说了civil law没有被广泛研究的原因一是因为其复杂性，但这个原因不靠谱，因为其复杂性和criminal law相当，但criminal law 已经被研究得很彻底了。
粗心了，49.5-17=32.5
又是粗心了。。。
Detachment 分离，拆开，超然，分遣，分遣队
这个传记作家以一种不寻常的分离来表现Zane Grey 的生活。他甚至不能确定Grey是个好的作家。
传统的出版公司取代amateur时，diversity will not last. 后一句是说因为这些公司必须保证homogeneity才能节约成本。
前面说了weakness。那么弱点不应该是它的统一性uniformity. 而应该是它的organization不够统一。这题认真读题应该不能出错。
答案在最后一段。The IOM team interpreted the nonsignificant result as evidence of the need for caution, whereas the Harvard group saw the data as consistent with studies reporting the benefits of omega-3s. 三个组用的是同样的数据，而interpretation不同。这并不能说明哪一组的结论是有问题的。而是说明有a difference in matters of interpretation.