附：上交辩论素材形式模版
Topic：World Governments Should Conduct Serious Campaigns Against Smoking
The argument : key words
1. Definite link: smoking and bronchial troubles, heart disease, lung cancer. 2. Governments hear, see, smell, no evil. 3. A few governments: timid measures.
4. E.g. Britain: TV advertising banned; nation’s conscience appeased; cancerous death.
5. Official reactions to medical findings: lukewarm.
6. Tobacco: source of revenue. E. g. Britain: tobacco tax pays for educations.
7. A short- sighted policy.
8. Enormous sums spent fighting the disease; lives lost. 9. Smoking should be banned altogether. 10. We are not ready for such drastic action.
11. But governments, if really concerned, should conduct aggressive anti-smoking campaigns.
12. The tobacco industry spends vast sums on advertising. 13. Advertising: insidious, dishonest.
14. Never shown pictures of real smokers coughing up lungs, only virile young men.
15. Smoking associated with great open-air life, beautiful girls, togetherness, Nonsense!
16. All advertising should be banned; anti-smoking campaign conducted. 17. Smoking should be banned in public places.
18. Young people should be warned, dire consequences. 19. Warning, death’s head, included in every packet. 20. Governments should protect us from ourselves. The counter-argument key words
1. There are still scientists who doubt smoking / cancer link. 2. People who don’t smoke should keep quiet. 3. Smoking brings many psychological benefits:
4. Relieves stresses of everyday life: provides constant consolation. 5. E. g. we smoke when taking exams, worried, bereaved, etc. 6. Associated with good living; social contacts made easier.
7. Smoking is very enjoyable: relaxing, e.g. with a cup of coffee; after a meal, etc.
8. It’s absurd to suggest we ban it after so many hundreds of years. 9. Enormous interests involved: governments, tobacco growers, tobacco industries, retail businesses.
10. Tax apart, important source of income to many countries: e.g. USA,
Rhodesia, Greece, Turkey.
11. People should be free to decide, not bullied by governments; banning is undemocratic.
12. The tobacco industry spends vast sums on medical research. 13. Improved filters have resulted; e.g. Columbia University. 14. Now possible to smoke and enjoy it without danger. 6.11 语言反应训练 英语绕口令训练 1. A big black bug bit a big black bear, made the big black bear bleed blood.
2. A flea and a fly flew up in a flue. Said the flea, \the fly, \
3. A tidy tiger tied a tie tighter to tidy her tiny tail.
4. A writer named Wright was instructing his little son how to write Wright right. He said: \aright!\
5. Betty Botter had some butter, \. If I bake this bitter butter, it would make my batter bitter. But a bit of better butter -- that would make my batter better.\
6. Bill's big brother is building a beautiful building between two big brick blocks.
7. He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
8. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
9. I thought a thought. But the thought I thought wasn't the thought I thought I thought.
10. If you notice this notice you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.
11. If a shipshape ship shop stocks six shipshape shop-soiled ships, how many shipshape shop-soiled ships would six shipshape ship shops stock?
12. Sarah sitting in her sitting room, all she does is sits and shifts, all she does is sits and shifts.
13. She sells seashells by the sea shore. The shells she sells are surely seashells. So if she sells shells on the seashore, I'm sure she sells seashore shells.
14. Three gray geese in the green grass grazing. Gray were the geese and green was the grass.
15. While we were walking, we were watching window washers wash Washington's windows with warm washing water.
16. A Finnish fisher named Fisher failed to fish any fish one Friday afternoon and finally he found out a big fissure裂缝in his fishing-net.
17. Where is the watch I put in my pocket to take to the shop because
it had stopped?
18. Mr. Cook said to a cook: \the cook took the advice of Mr. Cook and bought the book.
19. How much dew would a dewdrop drop if a dewdrop could drop dew? 20. Sandy sniffed sweet smelling sunflower seeds while sitting beside a swift stream.
英语单词描述训练
目的：锻炼学生的语言表达能力、接受能力和理解能力
television；fridge；policeman；umbrella；doctor；housewife；taxi；subway；red；black；blue；cup；flower；……
故事接龙
目的：锻炼学生用英语思维、组织语言、表达思想的能力
? One day, I saw a girl on a bus...
? The animals in the forest are holding a meeting... ? I saw a woman in a car accident... 用所给词汇讲故事
目的：锻炼学生的反应能力、逻辑能力、和语言表达能力
? flower, butterfly, cry ? frog, cloud, horse ? boy, death, laugh ? TV, president, writer 个人对抗辩论赛辩题
1. If I were the Dean of Foreign Languages Department… 2. Planes, Cars, bicycles, or on foot, which do you prefer?
3. If I were a reporter, I’d like to cover entertainment news, international news, domestic news, or documentaries.
4. If I were a writer, I would focus on … in my novels in this Wenchuan Earthquake.
辩论赛和辩论两者的参评标准是不一样的
辩 论赛是三方的事：正方，反方还有裁判。我们说一个队伍赢了是因为裁判说他们赢了（裁判判罚无法改变），然而裁判评判过程当中会综合的考虑到各种因素：双方 论点的厉害程度；某方观点能否击倒对方；两人配合是否默契；时间分配是否合理；辩手自身的口才；裁判个人的情感主观因素......我们自己作为辩手的并 不希望对方能够接受我们的观点，而是期盼能打动裁判。为了获取最终的胜利，我们可以使用语言当中的各种技巧，心理学中的技巧等等。
辩论， 是两方的事。它的评判标准是谁的方案（观点）更能够符合事实，更能解决问题谁就获胜（这是理论上的），它的评判是相当客观的。实际中辩论的结果也是多种多样：一胜一负；双方各有道理，博采众长，采用两者结合的优化方案－－双赢；两者皆输（即两方答案均不正确）。
l 辩论赛和辩论所给予参与者的机会和时间不同
比赛要具有可观赏性，这就要有时间控制；辩论则相对来说没有时间限制，你可以随着研究的深入不断提出新的证据来支持自己的观点，可以四处请教高人来为自己出谋划策，你可以修改自己口误说错的话等等。
l 辩论赛和辩论参与者的策略方法不同
在 真正的辩论比赛当中，无论对方说的多么有道理，即便连自己听得都有道理，我们都不能承认其论点，具体的做法无非是：1）视而不见（下策）2）避重就轻 （上策，一般来说，辩手会故意夸大自己提出的本来不那么重要理由，而使裁判轻视对方提出的未加修饰和夸大的但却很重要的理由。）
反观辩论，为寻求解决办法的辩论双方都会本着实事求是的原则，客观的考虑对方的观点，并且在自己的原来总的观点上作出微小的修正：以使自己的方案更能符合事实。
杨立民教授：
作为一个教育工作者，我觉得这些辩论赛传达给我们的年轻学生三个重要的讯息。 第一，外语能力（包括口语能力）是值得为之奋斗终身的一种才能。
人们常说外语是交际的工具，是就业的保障，是打开个人幸福之门的金钥匙，是价值几十亿的大产业。实际上，外语的重要性不能完全从功利主义的角度去理解。我们还要看到它对我们现代化的成败，文化的再造，民族的复兴的作用。
我 们都知道金钱是一种力量，科学家告诉我们知识也是一种力量，作为一个外语教师，我要说，语言也是一种力量，口才也是一种力量。历史上叱咤风云的伟人，大多 同时也是语言大师。试想一个人，不仗权势，不动刀枪，不靠钱财，仅凭三寸不烂之舌，用我们熟悉的词加以不同排列组合，结果就能如此影响人，感动人，激励 人，说服人，团结人，组织人，改造人；就能如此一呼百应，让人舍生忘死，冲锋陷阵，是多了不起的力量！当年马克思一句“全世界无产者联合起来”，曾经激励 多少革命者为之献身。美国革命时期又有多少战士默默念着帕特里克?亨利的那句名言“不自由，毋宁死！”走上战场。讲到历史上的雄辩家，我们会想起林肯著名 的葛底斯堡演说，短短272字，却字字闪耀着光辉，成为不朽的经典。中国古代历史上曾经有个叫鬼谷子的，他的两个学生苏秦和张仪，一个周游列国，说服他们 联合抗秦，结果挂了六国相印；另一个却说服秦国将六国各个击破，结果统一了中国。说到培养一流雄辩家的杰出专家，这位老先生应该算是祖师爷。我们现在的各 类辩论赛，应该说重新唤起了我们对辩才的重视，让我们记起它是多么难得的艺术，多么有力的武器，多么巨大的力量。
辩论赛的第二个启示是：我们的学生应该有一种关切社会的精神，用一位名人的话说，就是要有一种指点江山的精神。
人 生来就有生存、温饱、发展的要求，在这一点上，人和动物没有差别。人之所以成为人，正是因为人还有列在马斯洛需求金字塔上层的要求。人类文明进步的过程说 到底也就是人类从只关心自己，到逐步关心家庭、部落、氏族、国家、社会、全世界、全人类的过程。这些年来，社会上出现了一种拜金主义和只顾个人眼前物质利 益，对社会各种问题，人类面临的各种挑战冷漠无知的危险倾向。感谢这些辩论赛，让成千上万的年轻学生深入思考各种重大问题，让他们去研究全球化的利弊，转 基因食品的得失，取消死刑的是非，安乐死的考虑等等。实际上围绕辩论赛准备的题材远远超过了以上的范围，而且可以肯定，随着改革开放的进一步深入，国内政 治空气日益宽松，人们会享有越来越多的言论自由，辩论必将越来越体现“真理面前无禁区”的原则，涉及越来越多的重大的敏感话题。这对于培养新世纪人才，培 养能够应对种种复杂的新问题，新挑战的年轻一代具有难以估量的意义。
辩论赛的第三个启示是：我们的学生必须有一种独立思辩的能力。
他 们看问题不能简单化；不能人云亦云，随大流，瞎起哄；不能只知其一，不知其二；不能先入为主，靠喜好，凭感觉，无根无据，胡言乱语；不能不尊重对方观点， 肆意歪曲，断章取义，攻其一点，不及其余。辩论赛的好处就在于让我们养成一个习惯，一种凡事都要问为什么的习惯；让我们学会一种本领，一种通过分析，思辩 找到真理的本领。我们的学
校不能生产只具有一定谋生本领的学生，不能出品只装有一些固定软件的机器人，我们要为社会提供的应该是具有强烈求知欲望，能够进 行创造性思维的不同的个体