阐述IFC标准的几个基本问题(4)

2019-01-26 14:28

Preprocessing of the two ontologies, OmniClass and IfcXML, is necessary at the beginning stage. The entity concept

terms of both ontologies are extracted. Unique ID and suffix of the concepts are removed and duplicated concepts are discarded. The entire preprocessed concept terms of OmniClass and IfcXML are latched to each section of the International Building Codes (IBC) XML files. The concept tags, and , are inserted into the corresponding sections which match the concepts in the stemmed form.

In the example showed on the right, the concepts \from OmniClass and the concepts \to the same section 2209.2 of IBC. It implies that they may be potentially related in some aspects. Further confirmation of their relatedness can be deduced by considering their co-occurrence in other sections. Relatedness Analysis

The number of co-occurred sections of the two concepts and the number of times the two concepts are matched to each of these sections reveal the semantic similarity between the two concepts. Three relatedness analysis measures have been used for concept comparison between OmniClass and IfcXML. They

are cosine similarity measure, Jaccard similarity coefficient, and market basket model. Cosine similarity is a measure of similarity between two vectors of n

dimensions by finding the angle between them. Jaccard similarity coefficient is a statistical measure, using set theory, of the extent of overlapping of two vectors in n dimensions compared to union. Market basket model is a probabilistic data-mining technique to find item-item correlation.

Although in most circumstances related concepts can be captured by treating each section as an independent dimension in concept co-occurrence comparison, some

related concepts rarely co-occur in the same sections. Examples are Is-A-related concepts (e.g. \same scope (e.g. \considered in order to capture those related but not co-occurred concepts. Results

Besides identical concepts such as \\conventional term matching techniques, for instance, \

OmniClass and \analysis. In the test case, market basket model outperforms other two

relatedness analysis approaches in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) as well as F-measure, a combination of precision and recall rate. In fact, the market basket model shows the highest recall rate and a moderately high precision.

Evaluation results of the three measures using RMSE

Evaluation results of the three measures using F-Measure

Contributions

This research proposes a new approach to compare and map heterogeneous ontologies, so as to achieve interoperability between data models. It enables information exchange and sharing among project stakeholders. Once the mapping between ontologies is completed, updating and consistency checking of data can also be allowed although the data sources are using different data models.


阐述IFC标准的几个基本问题(4).doc 将本文的Word文档下载到电脑 下载失败或者文档不完整,请联系客服人员解决!

下一篇:基于51超声波测距器设计--中国矿业大学徐海学院电子04-1 鲍海鸿

相关阅读
本类排行
× 注册会员免费下载(下载后可以自由复制和排版)

马上注册会员

注:下载文档有可能“只有目录或者内容不全”等情况,请下载之前注意辨别,如果您已付费且无法下载或内容有问题,请联系我们协助你处理。
微信: QQ: