“Previous studies only compared female bones to contemporary male bones,” the researchers said, “And that’s a problem, because the response of male bones to stress and change is much bigger than that of women. For instance, as humans moved from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle constantly on the move to a more settled agrarian(农耕的) one, changes can be observed in the structure of the shinbone(胫骨), and these changes were much more evident in men.”
However, a comparison of the bones of prehistoric women to the bones of living female athletes can help us work out a more accurate picture of what those prehistoric women were doing. “By analyzing the bones of living people and comparing them to the ancient bones, we can start to explain the kinds of labor our ancestors were reforming,” Macintosh said. What they found was that women’s leg strength hasn’t changed a great deal, but their arms used to be very powerful. Prehistoric women, the researchers found, had arm strength 11-16 percent stronger than those of modern rowers, and 30 percent stronger than those of non-athletes. 28. What does the study tell about prehistoric women?
A. They were stronger than men. B. They had lighter bones than men. C. They did tough tasks as the men. D. They spent most time staying at home.
29. What problem did previous studies on prehistoric bones have?
A. They lacked enough comparison. B. They only studied men’s bones C. They focused little on bones. D. They ignored the lifestyles
30. What does the underlined word “that” in Paragraph 3 refer to?
A. Bones’ structure. B. Bones’ thickness C. Bones’ response to stress. D. Bones’ stress from hard labor. 31. What can we learn from the last paragraph?
A. It’s still hard to explain our ancestors’ lifestyle. B. Prehistoric women went through much suffering. C. Women’s arms have become much stronger over time. D. Prehistoric women are stronger than contemporary females.
页
6第