Manuscript review Recommendation
1. Publish after minor changes 2. Publish unaltered
3. Review again after major changes
4. Reject (Paper is not of sufficient quality or novelty to be published in this Journal) 5. Reject (Paper is seriously flawed; do not encourage resubmission.) A. Evaluation
1. How do you evaluate the manuscript?
Excellent Good Fair Poor B. Content
1. Is this paper of original value?
Yes, definitely To some extent Hardly
I cannot judge this
2. Is this paper scientifically correct?
Yes
Probably, although all details have not been checked Doubtful
3. To what extent will the results be useful for other scientists?
Large Average Small
4. How would you characterize the level of the paper?
For experts only
Useful for people working in related fields Understandable also for nonspecialists Superficial
6. Is the bibliography reasonable?
Yes
After minor modifications No
C. Presentation
1. Is this title adequate?
Yes No
2. Does the abstract give a correct description of the content?
Yes No
3. Is the general organization of the paper acceptable?
Yes No
4. With respect to the content, is the length of the paper reasonable?
Yes
No, should be increased No, should be decreased 5. How do you rate readability?
Good
Some effort needed Large effort needed Unreadable