TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN THE REVOLUTION IN PHYSICS AT THE T(12)

18 ibid., p.84.
19 H. Poincare, The Foundations of Science, translated by G.B. Halsted, New York, The Science Press, 1913, pp.92-93.
20 L.P. Williams, ed., Relativity Theory: its Origins and Impact on Modern Thought. New York, John & Sons, 1968, pp.39-40.
21 Poincare, op. cit., note 19, p.297.
22 ibid., p.7.
23 ibid., p.297.
24 ibid., p.152.
25 ibid., p.295.
26 K. Pearson, The Grammar of Science. 3rd ed. London: Adam & Black, 1911, p.385.
27 Poincare, op. cit., note 19, p.143.
28 ibid., p.320.
29 ibid., p.123.
30 ibid., p.140.
31 E.N. Hiebert, “The Genesis of Mach’s Early Views on Atomism,” in R.S. Cohen, ed., Ernst Mach, Physicist and Philosopher. New York: Humanities Press, 1970, pp.79-106.
32 D. Mellor, The Evolution of the Atomic Theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1971, p.158.
33 Mary Jo Nye, Molecular Reality: A Perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin. London: 1972, p.157.
34 V.I. Lenin, Selected Works, 2nd ed., Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1972, vol. 2, p.316.
35 Mach, op. cit., note 11, pp.289-290.
36 ibid., p.280.
37.Einstein, op. cit,. note 3, vol. 1, pp.157, 548.
38 Poincare, op. cit., note 19, p.127.
39 ibid., pp.280-281.
40 E. Mach, Analysis of Sensations, transl. By Hong Qian etal., Commercial Press, 1957, pp.70;96.
41 Einstein, op. cit., note 3, vol. 1, p.85.
42 Duhem, op. cit., note 4, pp.172, 168.
43 Poincare, op. cit., note 19, p.123.
44 ibid., p.319.
45 ibid., p.28.
46 ibid., p.65.
47 ibid., pp.133-134.
48 Lenin, Notes on Philosophy, People’s Publishing House, 1961, p.305.
49 Einstein, op. cit., note 3, vol. 1, p.438.
50 Mach, op. cit., note 40, p.6.
51 ibid., p.4.
52 E.N. Hiebert, “Ernst Mach”, in C.C. Gillispie, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: 1970-1977, vol. 8, pp.595-607.
53 Duhem, op. cit., note 4, p.19.
54 ibid., p.23.
55 ibid., p.165.
56 Pearson, op. cit., note 26, p.120.
57 ibid., p.113.
58 Poincare, op. cit., note 19, p.127.
59 ibid., p.130.
60 ibid., p.349.
61 ibid., p.352.
62 Lenin, op. cit., note 34, vol. 4, p.610.
63 M. Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. London: 1950, p.13.
64 “The Debate about Atomic Theory and the Mechanical Viewpoint of Nature at the End of the 19th Century”, Research in the History of Science (in Japanese) 16 (1977) 199-206.
65 Einstein, op. cit., note 3, p.292.
66 Engels, op. cit., note 1, p.92.