6. In line 55, ―charge‖ most nearly means A) responsibility. B) attack. C) fee. D) expense.
7. The narrator indicates that Claude, Wilfrid, Irene, and Viola are A) similar to many of their peers. B) unusually creative and intelligent. C) hostile to the idea of a governess. D) more educated than others of their age.
8. The narrator implies that Mrs. Quabarl favors a form of education that emphasizes
A) traditional values. B) active engagement. C) artistic experimentation. D) factual retention.
9. As presented in the passage, Mrs. Quabarl is best described as A) superficially kind but actually selfish. B) outwardly imposing but easily defied. C) socially successful but irrationally bitter. D) naturally generous but frequently imprudent.
10. Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?
A) Lines 49-50 (―How . . . careless‖) B) Lines 62-68 (―I wish . . . memory‖) C) Lines 70-73 (―I shall . . . Russian‖) D) Lines 77-82 (―She was . . . apologetic‖)
Questions 11-20 are based on the following passage and supplementary material.
This passage is adapted from Taras Grescoe, Straphanger: Saving Our Cities and Ourselves from the Automobile. ?2012 by Taras Grescoe. Though there are 600 million cars on the planet, and counting, there are also seven billion people, which means that for the vast majority of us getting around involves taking buses, ferryboats, commuter 5 trains, street cars, and subways. In other words, traveling to work, school, or the market means being a straphanger: somebody who, by choice or necessity,
relies on public transport, rather than a privately owned automobile. 10 Half the population of New York, Toronto, and London do not own cars. Public transport is how most of the people of Asia and Africa, the world?s most populous continents, travel. Every day, subway systems carry 155 million passengers, thirty-four 15 times the number carried by all the world?s airplanes, and the global public transport market is now valued at $428 billion annually. A century and a half after
the invention of the internal combustion engine, private car ownership is still an anomaly.
20 And yet public transportation, in many minds, is the opposite of glamour—a squalid last resort for those with one too many impaired driving charges, too poor to afford insurance, or too decrepit to get behind the wheel of a car. In much of North
25 America, they are right: taking transit is a depressing experience. Anybody who has waited far too long on a street corner for the privilege of boarding a lurching, overcrowded bus, or wrestled luggage onto subways and shuttles to get to a big city airport, 30 knows that transit on this continent tends to be underfunded, ill-maintained, and ill-planned. Given the opportunity, who wouldn?t drive? Hopping in a car almost always gets you to your destination more quickly.
35 It doesn?t have to be like this. Done right, public transport can be faster, more comfortable, and cheaper than the private automobile. In Shanghai, German-made magnetic levitation trains skim over elevated tracks at 266 miles an hour, whisking people 40 to the airport at a third of the speed of sound. In provincial French towns, electric-powered streetcars run silently on rubber tires, sliding through narrow streets along a single guide rail set into cobblestones. From Spain to Sweden, Wi-Fi equipped high-speed 45 trains seamlessly connect with highly ramified metro networks, allowing commuters to work on laptops as
they prepare for same-day meetings in once distant capital cities. In Latin America, China, and India, working people board fast-loading buses that move 50 like subway trains along dedicated busways, leaving the sedans and SUVs of the rich mired in dawn-to-dusk traffic jams. And some cities have transformed their streets into cycle-path freeways, making giant strides in public health and safety and 55 the sheer livability of their neighborhoods—in the process turning the workaday bicycle into a viable form of mass transit.
If you credit the demographers, this transit trend has legs. The “Millenials,” who reached adulthood 60 around the turn of the century and now outnumber baby boomers, tend to favor cities over suburbs, and are far more willing than their parents to ride buses and subways. Part of the reason is their ease with iPads, MP3 players, Kindles, and smartphones: you 65 can get some serious texting done when you?re not driving, and earbuds offer effective insulation from all but the most extreme commuting annoyances. Even though there are more teenagers in the country than ever, only ten million have a driver?s license 70 (versus twelve milliona generation ago). Baby boomers may have been raised in Leave It to Beaver suburbs, but as they retire, a significant contingent is favoring older cities and compact towns where they have the option of walking and riding bikes. Seniors, 75 too, are more likely to use transit, and by2025, there
will be 64 million Americans over the age of
sixty-five. Already, dwellings in older neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., Atlanta, and Denver, especially those near light-rail or subway stations, are 80 commanding enormous price premiums over suburban homes. The experience of European and Asian cities shows that if you make buses, subways, and trains convenient, comfortable, fast, and safe, a surprisingly large percentage of citizens will opt to 85 ride rather than drive.
11. What function does the third paragraph (lines 20-34) serve in the passage as a