（申请硕士学位）
研 究 生 毕 业 论 文
论文题目 海峡两岸法院调解制度的比较研究 作者姓名 朱春雨 学科、专业名称 法学、法律硕士 研 究 方 向 民事诉讼法 指导教师 吴英姿 教授
二O一四年五月十七日
学 号：论文答辩日期：指 导 教 师：
MF1105091 2014年5月17日 （签字）2
南京大学研究生毕业论文中文摘要首页用纸 毕业论文题目： 海峡两岸法院调解制度的比较研究 法律硕士 专业 11 级 硕 士生姓名： 朱春雨 指导教师（姓名、职称）： 吴英姿 教授
摘要
被誉为“东方经验”的法院调解制度在民事诉讼领域中占有重要地位，法院调解在解决民事纠纷、降低法官压力等方面具有优势。中国大陆近十年的法院调解热度不减，法院调解盛行的背后掩盖了很多问题，需要学界和实务界对调解“热”进行冷思考。我国台湾地区与大陆有着相近的民事诉讼制度，民事诉讼法经历几次修订后，已经日臻完善，法院调解制度也在新的时代背景下得以发展。同样面临案件积压过多、法官工作压力较大的困境，台湾地区法院调解并没有大面积出现变相强制调解、侵犯当事人诉讼权利的问题，至于其中的原因，需要就两岸法院调解制度进行全面的比较，探究制度设计上的差异，以期为大陆法院调解制度的改革提供有益借鉴。本文主要分为如下四部分：
第一部分的主要内容是问题的提出。由于法院调解在解决纠纷过程中发挥的作用越来越大，法院调解成为了中国法院处理纠纷的主要手段之一。在法院调解的广度和深度不断增加的同时，中国大陆法院调解也出现了很多问题，需要寻求解决的办法；在台湾地区，法院调解同样也越来越受重视，但是大陆出现的问题在台湾能够较好的被解决，两岸在法院调解的制度设计上是否存在差异以及两岸可以相互借鉴的地方又有哪些，这是本文需要解决的问题。
第二部分的主要内容是两岸法院调解的比较。首先对两岸法院调解的历史沿革以及法院调解制度的法律规定进行介绍，对两岸法院调解历史沿革的节点提出了自己的观点，并且从法院调解的基本流程进行法律规定的介绍，涉及法院调解的基本原则、启动、进行、终结、适用阶段、先行调解、不得调解、调解效力的规定。
第三部分的主要内容是针对第二部分的内容的分析评价。从法院调解的性质、原则、程序以及效力等方面进行比较研究，每一个方面再做进一步的划分和比较。该部分提出了大陆学者和台湾学者之间的观点以及内部的争议，同时也给出了笔者自己的一些看法，以期将两岸法院调解的差异尽可能的展现。
第四部分的主要内容是两岸法院调解制度的借鉴，台湾地区这些年行之有效的法院调解制度值得大陆去借鉴，笔者从两岸法院调解制度的比较过程中提出了可以借鉴的地方，包括“调审分离”模式的引入、先行调解案件的单独立法、保障法官独立进行调解，以期大陆地区法院调解能够更加完善。
关键字：中国大陆、台湾地区、法院调解、比较、借鉴
3
南京大学研究生毕业论文英文摘要首页用纸 THESIS： Comparative study on the court mediation system between Mainland and Taiwan SPECIALIZATION: Juris Master POSTGRADUATE: Zhu Chunyu MENTOR: Professor Wu Yingzi
Abstract
Known as the \the area of civil procedure litigation, the court has the advantage of resolving civil disputes by mediation, and it helps the judge reduce pressure etc.Court mediation has been famous in mainland China for nearly a decade,a lot of problems hide behind the court mediation,it is in great need of academic and practical learners to make a cold think on the mediation \\Taiwan has a similar civil litigation system with mainland China, the Civil Procedure Law of Taiwan has been made perfectly through several revisions,the court mediation system of Taiwan is also developed in the new era. Taiwan also faces excessive cases and judges' working pressure, but the problems appears in mainland China's court mediation, like mandatory mediation,infringe on litigants' rights, didn't appear frequently in Taiwan, as to the reasons, requiring to conduct a comprehensive comparison between mainland China's mediation system and Taiwan,and exploring the differences in the design of two sides. The aim is to provide a useful reference for the reformation of the mainland's court mediation system. This paper is divided into the following four parts:
The main contents of the first section is providing the problem.As the court mediation plays a more important role in resolving the disputes,court mediation has become one of the primary means to handle disputes in China.The breadth and depth of court mediation is increasing,meanwhile,court mediation of mainland China has a lot of problems,you need to find some solutions;In Taiwan,courts also pay more and more attentions to court mediation,but the mainland's problems can be better solved in Taiwan.How are the court mediation system designed as well as what can we learn from each other are the problems that we need to be solve in this article.
The main contents of the second part is to compare court mediation system of two sides . At
4
first,the court mediation history of both sides and the law of court mediation system are introduced,i put forward my point of view on the nodes of two sides' history of court mediation, introduce the law of two sides by introducing the basic process of court mediation.including basic principals,the start,the process,the ending,the stage,priority mediation,prohibited mediation and the effect of mediation.
The main content of the third section is making analysis and evaluation of the second section.Comparing two sides by the nature of the court mediation,the basic principals,the scope of the court mediation and the effectiveness etc,and divide each aspect into more parts and do further comparisons.This section presents the views of mainland's learners and Taiwan's learners, as well as internal disputes in two sides,and also it includes some views of author myself, with a hope to show differences of two sides in court mediation as much as possible .
The main content of the fourth section is to learn from each other in the court mediation system. Taiwan's effective court mediation system is worth to being learned by the mainland,the author puts forward somes measures that the mainland can learn from, including the \of judge and mediation \model can be introduced,the separate legislation of priority mediation,make sure judges could do the court mediation independently etc.I hope the mainland's court mediation can be more perfect in the future.
Keywords : mainland China, Taiwan, court mediation, compare, learn
5