沃博专业低价验厂辅导百分百包通过：TEL15813620008 钟先生
5)
Manufacturing Process
5.5
Do the products/semi-finished product conduct functional/safety tests? List the testing items. (a) 100%
For carbon fiber tube, 30 kilograms load was applied to check its durability.
For badminton racket: 30 kilograms strength was applied to conduct the torque test in an angle of 30 degree to check any breakage or torn. (b) Sampling
The IPQC would randomly pick up samples from each workstation per two hours to conduct the quality inspection. The faulty items would be sorted out for rework and disposal immediately. (c) In house/Outside laboratory?
There was an in house laboratory was set up in factory. For carbon fiber rackets, net life test, frame lift test, torque test, frame tension test would be conducted in the laboratory. And samples would be sent to outside laboratory for testing as per client’s requirement.
Are the tests adequate to detect non-conformance?
The inspection and test was found adequate to detect the non-conformance.
Are faulty items properly identified and segregated?
The faulty items were identified and then segregated in the assigned containers.
Is scrap efficiently cleared from the shop floor?
The production workshops were found clean during plant tour.
Are these records from the manufacturing processes used in conducting corrective action?
Yes, the records from the manufacturing processes were used in conducting corrective action. The corrective and preventive actions taken records were kept for reference.
5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9
www.bsci-intl.net
沃博专业低价验厂辅导百分百包通过：TEL15813620008 钟先生
6)
Calibration
6.1 6.2
Do they have a master list of the calibrated equipment?
During the visit, the master list of the calibrated equipment was not provided for reference. Only the equipment list was available for reference.
Do they have annual schedule for the calibration?
Claimed by the factory representative that the annual calibration schedule was set up. But the calibration schedule and calibration records were kept by a manager who was absent during the visit, so the calibration schedule and records were not provided for reference.
Check from the manufacturing site, any measuring devices are out of calibration?
During plant tour, some calipers in the aluminum forming workshop were out of calibrated.
From calibration records, do they traceable to international standard? Due to no calibration records were provided, it could not be verified.
6.3 6.4
www.bsci-intl.net
沃博专业低价验厂辅导百分百包通过：TEL15813620008 钟先生
7)
Training / Complaint / Internal Audit
7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9
Does training provide to the staff? Yes, training was provided to the staff.
Any training plan? List the training categories?
The training plan and categories were established and documented in place. The training categories included new staff induction training, working skill and working safety training.
Verify the training record?
The training record was kept and available for reference.
Availability of master list of the customer complaint?
The customer complaint master list was kept and available for reference.
Check any corrective/preventive action carry out for each complaint?
With refer to the records, corrective and preventive action was carried out for each complaint.
Any improvement on the trend of the complaint?
There were 3 cases complaint from 2005 to now. The trend of complaint was down.
Availability of internal audit plan?
Yes, the internal audit was planned and performed.
How many non-conformities (NC) find from the latest audit?
The latest internal audit was conducted on Jun 18, 2005. And with refer to the record, there were 2 non-conformities were found from this audit.
How many of these NCs still open since last internal audit?
The 2 non-conformities were closed and the record was kept for reference.
www.bsci-intl.net
沃博专业低价验厂辅导百分百包通过：TEL15813620008 钟先生
8)
Purchasing
8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4
Availability of Approved Supplier List?
The approved supplier list was documented and available for reference.
What criterions are used to assess a new supplier?
Production capacity, quality of goods, service and price would be acted as main factors for supplier selection. And they would request the supplier to provide the sample for confirmation before order was placed.
Do they have a rating system to measure the on-going performance of the supplier?
As per the factory representative that they would focus on the incoming goods quality and on time delivery status to measure the supplier’s on going performance. But no record was kept for reference.
For those suppliers offering poor performance, what action will perform? Give details?
The IQC would conduct the inspection for the quality of incoming goods. If the supplier provided poor quality of incoming goods. They would report to the purchasing staff. The purchasing staff would inform the supplier to improve it. If the supplier still provides poor performance such as poor quality and delay delivery then the supplier would not be used again.
9)
Incoming Goods and Material
9.1
Availability of inspection criteria?
The inspection procedure and main checkpoints were defined and documented in place for QC reference. The IQC would randomly draw sample for inspection according to the order information/ specification or approved samples. The total defect rate should not exceed 1%. But the defect classification was not defined. For paint, they would draw some samples for a trial production to check it quality and color. The inspection and trial production records were kept in place for reference.
Are all incoming goods required performing inspection? Not all incoming goods required performing inspection.
9.2.1 If No, which materials do not require inspection?
As per factory representative that PVC leather, thread and chemical liquid for cleaning purpose were not required performing inspection.
9.2.2 Do they offer the list for those items not requiring incoming inspection?
The not requiring incoming inspection list was not documented and available for reference.
9.2
10)
Finished Goods
10.1
Availability of inspection criteria?
www.bsci-intl.net
沃博专业低价验厂辅导百分百包通过：TEL15813620008 钟先生
The inspection procedure and sampling method was defined in the place for reference. The sampling method and accepted quality level was: 1) For the production lot less than 30 cartons, 5 pieces would be drawn from each 3 selected cartons and the defect sample should not be exceeded 2 samples. 2) For the production lot between 30 to 50 cartons, 5 pieces would be drawn from each 5 selected cartons and the defect sample should not be exceeded 2 samples. 3) For the production lot between 50 to 80 cartons, 5 pieces would be drawn from each 8 selected cartons and the defect sample should not exceed 3 samples. 4) For the production lot between 80 to 120 cartons, 5 pieces would be drawn from 10 selected cartons and the defect samples should not be exceed 3 samples. 5) For the production lot above 120 cartons, 5 pieces would be drawn from each 15 selected cartons and the defect samples should not be exceeded 5 samples. But the defect classification was not clearly defined for reference.
Check inspection record?
The inspection records were kept in place for reference. But with reference to the records, some inspection was found conducted with wrong sampling method.
How they segregate non-conforming product?
The non-conforming products were segregated in assigned containers for rework or disposal.
10.2 10.3
www.bsci-intl.net