Group assignment
Requirements:
Refer to Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of your textbook, especially the Articles of CISG, analyze the following cases. My suggestion is you can analyze the case following this order: 1. What is the basic case fact? 2. What is the key issue of this case?
3. Which article(s) of CISG or INCOTERMS can solve this issue? 4. How do you analyze this case according to CISG or INCOTERMS? 5. What is your final conclusion?
Group 1
买方A为其锯木厂购置了一套液压设备，要求当地经销美孚石油公司产品的的经销商B为为这套设备提供合适的液压油。该经销商在向美孚石油公司的代表作了咨询后提供了一种美孚产品。结果被证明根本无法使用，而且还损坏了液压设备。问：美孚产品的经销商违反了什么义务？
Group assignment
Requirements:
Refer to Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of your textbook, especially the Articles of CISG, analyze the following cases. My suggestion is you can analyze the case following this order: 1. What is the basic case fact? 2. What is the key issue of this case?
3. Which article(s) of CISG or INCOTERMS can solve this issue? 4. How do you analyze this case according to CISG or INCOTERMS? 5. What is your final conclusion?
Group 2
2001年11月25日，德国A公司向香港B有限公司发出如下要约:Jettish彩色复印机2000台，每台汉堡船上交货价(FOB)4000美元，即期装运，要约的有效期截止到12月30日。A公司发出要约后，又收到了巴黎某公司购买该种型号复印机的要约，报价高于A公司发给香港B有限公司的要约价格。由于当时香港B有限公司尚未对该要约作出承诺，故而A公司于12月15日向香港B公司发出撤销11月25日要约的通知，而后与巴黎方面的公司签约。但是，12月22日，A公司收到了香港B有限公司的承诺，同意德国A公司的要约条件，并随之向A公司开出了不可撤销的信用证，要求A公司履行合同。后因A公司末履约，香港B公司诉诸瑞典斯德哥尔摩仲裁庭，要求A公司赔偿损失。A公司的律师辩称，该公司于2001年11月25日发出的要约已于12月15日被该公司撤销，该要约已失去效力，因而B公司12月22目的承诺没有效力，购销合同没有成立。问题：(I)A公司的辩称是否成立，A公司11月25日发出的要约能否被撤销。(2)A公司与B公司之间是否存在有效的买卖合同。
Group assignment
Requirements:
Refer to Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of your textbook, especially the Articles of CISG, analyze the following cases. My suggestion is you can analyze the case following this order: 1. What is the basic case fact? 2. What is the key issue of this case?
3. Which article(s) of CISG or INCOTERMS can solve this issue? 4. How do you analyze this case according to CISG or INCOTERMS? 5. What is your final conclusion?
Group 3
原告为甲国羊毛生产商,被告为乙国羊毛供应商。1998年9月2日,被告致电原告,提出要出售一批羊毛，并要求原告以邮寄方式回复。因地址错误直到9月5日晚才到达原告，当天晚上原告即将承诺信件以邮递寄出，该承诺信件于9月9日到达被告。请结合CISG相关条款分析此案。
Group assignment
Requirements:
Refer to Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of your textbook, especially the Articles of CISG, analyze the following cases. My suggestion is you can analyze the case following this order: 1. What is the basic case fact? 2. What is the key issue of this case?
3. Which article(s) of CISG or INCOTERMS can solve this issue? 4. How do you analyze this case according to CISG or INCOTERMS? 5. What is your final conclusion?
Group 4
美国哈迪公司以“FOB里斯本”条件向 英国庞德公司购买300吨葡萄牙松节油，而实际上该批货物由葡萄牙供货人供货，并规定由该供货人取得出口许可证。但当作为买方的美国船只到达里斯本港口 时，葡萄牙政府拒绝签发货物发往东德的出口许可证，卖方船只由此未能装船。美方向英国上议院提起诉讼。请根据CISG和INCOTERMS分析此案。
Group assignment
Requirements:
Refer to Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of your textbook, especially the Articles of CISG, analyze the following cases. My suggestion is you can analyze the case following this order: 1. What is the basic case fact? 2. What is the key issue of this case?
3. Which article(s) of CISG or INCOTERMS can solve this issue? 4. How do you analyze this case according to CISG or INCOTERMS? 5. What is your final conclusion?
Group 5
出口商甲向进口商乙出售小麦1000公吨，CFR价格条件。但在装运港装船的小麦都是混装的，共3000公吨，卖方准备当货物运抵目的港后再分拨1000吨给买方。但小麦在路途因高温天气发生变质，共损失1200公吨， 其余1800吨得以安全运抵目的港。卖方向买方声明其出售的1000吨小麦已在途中全部损失，且认为根据CFR合同，风险从货物越过船舷时已转移给买方，故卖方对以上损失不应承担任何法律责任。买方则要求卖方继续履行合同。 双方遂提起仲裁。请结合CISG相关条款分析此案。