五段式变四段式
Some people think watching TV is bad for children, while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 【四段式】
Watching TV is one of the most important children’s leisure activities. However, whether it brings more harm than good has caused heated debate. My view is that parents have an essential role to play regarding to this.
Some educationists think watching TV is potentially harmful to children because when they spend more time sitting in front of a screen, their eyesight will be weakened and ids do not have enough time to engage in outdoor activities which are crucial for their physical growth. This is definitely true. The questionable content on TV can also cause negative implications. The fact that many developing countries including China lack a TV program rating system means that children are more easily exposed to indecent TV scenes.
On the other hand, some experts would argue that educational and inspirational TV shows enable kids to have fun in the learning process and facilitate their intellectual development. For example, many children
have learnt caring, courage, honesty and other virtues from the characters n classic Disney cartoons. Moreover, watching TV can be an important parent-child activity. Accompanying kids to watch their favourite shows is a great opportunity for adults to take part in their child’s interests and increase intimacy with children, to communicate deeply with them, and to fully read their minds.
Unfortunately, I do not think most parents have realized these points. Some even treat TV as a good babysitter to keep kids busy. It is parents’ responsibility to control the time kids spend on TV, choose the suitable programmes for them, and most importantly, enjoy it together with kids.
议论文15句逻辑框架高分范文 15句逻辑框架范文之一环境保护
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 提纲及原文 观点 原因1 原因2 每个人都能起作用。 环境问题是长期人类活动导致的。 个人能影响政府和公司的决定。 举例：如果人人不用一次性纸杯，就没有公司生产。 Answer
Environmental protection is one of the most important challenges almost every country is facing. However, whether only governments and big corporations have the resources and capabilities to preserve our environment is a controversial issue. My view is that every single citizen could also make a huge difference.
Firstly, it is clear that human activities have had the greatest impact on the environment throughout history. Both environmental degradation and preservation are the long-term process, and no single government or big company can meet this challenge alone. So, whoever created the
problem should solve it; environment protection needs every one of us to continuously participate in.
Moreover, the public’s wills and behaviors have a critical influence on government policies and company strategies. For example, if everyone says “no” to plastic shopping bags and paper cups, the companies that manufacture such products will switch to environmentally-friendly substitutes in order to survive in the market.
That is not to say that governments and large companies cannot positively contribute. Indeed, governments can enact laws and introduce programmes to raise the public’s ecological footprint awareness; companies can promote green products to change the public’s consuming habits. But they also need ever citizen’s appreciation and support to bring good results.
In summary, no effort is too small when we are protecting the environment. Meanwhile, local authorities and organisations must shoulder their responsibility to develop a low carbon economy at the macro level. Only by doing so can we assure that we will hand this beautiful planet to our next generation, and the next generation thereafter.
15句逻辑框架范文之二利用动物
Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 提纲及原文 观点 原因1 原因2 Answer
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about animal protection and animal rights. However, whether we should utilize animals for human purposes has recently caused a heated debate. In my view, it is acceptable to reasonably use animals for the benefit of mankind and impossible to completely cut down the human’s reliance on animals.
It is clear that human beings are standing at the top of the food chain of this planet. As big fish eat smaller ones, mankind uses animals for its own benefit, which is consistent with natural law. So, it is hard to say that we are doing wrong by exploiting animas for our interests.
人类合理利用动物是正当的。 自然法则，natural law, the law of the jungle 动物对人类文明贡献大，KFC, McDonald’s, even pets