Moreover, it is unrealistic to ban using animals since the history of human civilization is entwined with the history of the ways we have learned to manipulate animal resources. We have raised cattle for food, the outcomes of animal experiments have saved many lives, and people have even kept pets to satisfy their psychological needs. If using animals were prohibited, we would firstly close thousands of KFC and
McDonald’s franchises around the world, because they are slaughtering lovely chicken to make money! Moreover, everyone in this world would become a vegetarian.
This is not to say that it is always right for people to use animals for any purpose whatsoever. Some people hunt wild animals just for fun; others kill rare animals for their expensive furs. Indeed, these behaviours are not only cruel and unnecessary, but actually against long-term interests of human race. Humans should shoulder their responsibilities of maintaining the diversity of wild animals and the balance of ecosystem.
In summary, using animals rationally for the benefit of humans is justified. Meanwhile, some behaviours that are harmful to both animals and humans have to be prohibited. By doing so, we can ensure that our next generation will also benefit from animal resource.
15句逻辑框架范文之三科技影响
The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor.
To what extent do you agree? 提纲及原文
观点 原因1 原因2 不是科技而是社会财富分配不均导致的。 政府的责任。 科技其实还能缩小贫富差距。 举例：利用网站创业。 Answer
The application of new technologies is one of the most important ways of making millionaires such as Bill Gates. However, discussion now centres on whether the technology has also widened the gap between the rich and the poor. My view is that the improper distribution of social wealth, rather than an influx of modern technology, has caused such a social problem.
Firstly, it is generally acknowledged that the responsibility falls on the government as the one most capable and likely to solve any social issue and ensure social equality. In order to bridge this wealth gap, the most effective and direct method should be taxation leverage, by which the government can use rich people’s tax money to subsidise the less
fortunate. So, the technology should not become a scapegoat of this issue.
Conversely, modern technologies indeed have provided great opportunities for the impoverished to go from rags to riches. For example, many people have become wealthy by setting up their commercial websites on the Internet. Compared with traditional companies that require large initial investment and higher operation cost, the Interne is a cheaper and more accessible platform of ordinary people to make a fortune.
Those who harbor the view that technology has polarized the distribution of wealth around the world believe that poor countries are getting poorer due to the lack of creative technologies. Undeniably, this is a real phenomenon. But paradoxically, the right solution for those nations is just to introduce advanced technologies to improve social productivity, which is like the age-old chicken-or-egg question.
In summary, modern technology plays a key role in filling the gap between the rich and poor not only for individuals, but for nations as well. In the era of knowledge-based economy, one who is diligent and can capitalize on this knowledge will eventually prevail.
15句逻辑框架范文之四政府职能
Some people think rich countries should help the poor countries by giving money directly. Others believe that there are other more effective forms of international aid. What’s your opinion? 提纲及原文 观点 原因1 原因2 穷国最需要技术和人才。 科技是第一生产力。 富国可以帮助穷国培养人才。 举例：提供奖学金 Answer
Poverty is one of the most detrimental problems faced by many developing countries. However, which type of international aid is most effective for them is a controversial issue. In my view, what they need most is not financial aid or loans, but advanced technologies and talents in certain key areas.
It is obvious that modern technologies and scientific advancement are the driving force behind rich nations. Hi-tech products, innovations, and good management can greatly improve the productivity of a whole
society, hence wealth is accumulated at a high speed. Therefore, to help the poor, we had better give them tools that can make a fortune.
Moreover, developed countries cannot only send teams of experts to poor nations to build roads, dams, factories and other infrastructure, but also train talents and experts for them. Rich countries can provide scholarships or financial help to students from poorer regions, which some famous western universities are actually doing. It is also a wiser way to deliver help.
This is not to say that rich countries should not provide aid in form of money in any case. Of course, money definitely can help a country out of many urgent problems. But we have to make sure that international funds are spent where people really need it rather than filling the pockets of local corrupt politicians.
In summary, there are some other types of aid rich countries may choose to offer more efficiently, for example, providing advanced technologies and talents that can facilitate economic growth sustainably. From this sense, giving money to poor regions is not a direct aid, but an indirect form.